Squirming around was credited to the wider tread gap the atx has compared to the bfg. It seems that the tread . Unlike other tires from general tire, the grabber atx isn't equipped with the replacement tire monitor technology. Anyone currently driving general grabber atx tires? The at2 in p rating has 16/32 of tread depth, that is actually more than the bfg at 15/32.
Squirming around was credited to the wider tread gap the atx has compared to the bfg. Just check the ply ratings compared to the ko2. The at2 in p rating has 16/32 of tread depth, that is actually more than the bfg at 15/32. General grabber at2 (e rated) and the bf goodrich ko2 (c or e rated). Not great in anything, but didn't offend. Anyone currently driving general grabber atx tires? Unlike other tires from general tire, the grabber atx isn't equipped with the replacement tire monitor technology. You may want to consider the new general grabber atx if you're .
General grabber at2 (e rated) and the bf goodrich ko2 (c or e rated).
I'll sell you some street michelin's cheap. My first pair of ko2's lasted 90k, this last set was 71k. Second the design of the at2 is more . Anyone currently driving general grabber atx tires? Just check the ply ratings compared to the ko2. Ko2 and grabber atx both perform well on the road. Squirming around was credited to the wider tread gap the atx has compared to the bfg. Not great in anything, but didn't offend. The ko2s are probably the better tire and they'll probably last longer, so they'd be worth the price difference imo. But the grabbers are still . Unlike other tires from general tire, the grabber atx isn't equipped with the replacement tire monitor technology. It seems that the tread . After an obsessive research i narrowed it down to either falken wildpeak at3/w or general grabber atx.
Not great in anything, but didn't offend. I'll sell you some street michelin's cheap. Anyone currently driving general grabber atx tires? Ko2 and grabber atx both perform well on the road. Grabber atx is slightly louder than ko2 as it has big grooves resulting in a more open area for airflow, .
You may want to consider the new general grabber atx if you're . I'll sell you some street michelin's cheap. I have the general grabber atx on my 03 f150 not had a single problem with them. It seems that the tread . But the grabbers are still . Bfg is sort of that classic tire with a cult following because bfg has been associated with just about every kind of off roading for decades. Switching from bfg ko2's to general grabber atx's. After an obsessive research i narrowed it down to either falken wildpeak at3/w or general grabber atx.
Switching from bfg ko2's to general grabber atx's.
I'll sell you some street michelin's cheap. You may want to consider the new general grabber atx if you're . Second the design of the at2 is more . After an obsessive research i narrowed it down to either falken wildpeak at3/w or general grabber atx. It's time for tires and i have a question for the masses, side note. It seems that the tread . Ko2 and grabber atx both perform well on the road. General grabber at2 (e rated) and the bf goodrich ko2 (c or e rated). Squirming around was credited to the wider tread gap the atx has compared to the bfg. Just check the ply ratings compared to the ko2. Grabber atx is slightly louder than ko2 as it has big grooves resulting in a more open area for airflow, . Anyone currently driving general grabber atx tires? My first pair of ko2's lasted 90k, this last set was 71k.
General grabber at2 (e rated) and the bf goodrich ko2 (c or e rated). Just check the ply ratings compared to the ko2. Bfg is sort of that classic tire with a cult following because bfg has been associated with just about every kind of off roading for decades. My first pair of ko2's lasted 90k, this last set was 71k. Not great in anything, but didn't offend.
I have the general grabber atx on my 03 f150 not had a single problem with them. General grabber at2 (e rated) and the bf goodrich ko2 (c or e rated). You may want to consider the new general grabber atx if you're . I'll sell you some street michelin's cheap. The ko2s are probably the better tire and they'll probably last longer, so they'd be worth the price difference imo. The at2 in p rating has 16/32 of tread depth, that is actually more than the bfg at 15/32. Unlike other tires from general tire, the grabber atx isn't equipped with the replacement tire monitor technology. Not great in anything, but didn't offend.
Unlike other tires from general tire, the grabber atx isn't equipped with the replacement tire monitor technology.
I have the general grabber atx on my 03 f150 not had a single problem with them. Just check the ply ratings compared to the ko2. General grabber at2 (e rated) and the bf goodrich ko2 (c or e rated). It's time for tires and i have a question for the masses, side note. Grabber atx is slightly louder than ko2 as it has big grooves resulting in a more open area for airflow, . It seems that the tread . But the grabbers are still . Second the design of the at2 is more . After an obsessive research i narrowed it down to either falken wildpeak at3/w or general grabber atx. Not great in anything, but didn't offend. You may want to consider the new general grabber atx if you're . My first pair of ko2's lasted 90k, this last set was 71k. The ko2s are probably the better tire and they'll probably last longer, so they'd be worth the price difference imo.
General Grabber Atx Vs Ko2 - General Grabber HTS | TireBuyer - Switching from bfg ko2's to general grabber atx's.. Anyone currently driving general grabber atx tires? General grabber at2 (e rated) and the bf goodrich ko2 (c or e rated). The at2 in p rating has 16/32 of tread depth, that is actually more than the bfg at 15/32. The ko2s are probably the better tire and they'll probably last longer, so they'd be worth the price difference imo. Ko2 and grabber atx both perform well on the road.
Post a Comment